I rarely listen to the BBC any more, as they have revealed such poor judgement, bias and willingness to engage in indoctrination, mostly by sleight of hand, that I want nothing to do with them. However, while driving yesterday I heard the whole of the Radio 4 programme ‘Great Lives’ which was about the nutritional scientist Elsie Widdowson. Continue reading
It’s two months since Ocado and Waitrose suddenly dropped St Helen’s Farm Goat’s Cream from their line. This was desperate for my family and patients who react to cow’s dairy and rely on goat and sheep products. This is the only cream available in the UK and my family purchased six or more pots per week. It is a perfect substitute for double cream, whips beautifully, and is great in coffee, on fruit and in cooking. We love it!
When we enquired why they had stopped stocking it we were told it was not making enough money! So why not put up the price? We would have paid it?
We approached St Helens Farm direct, but they had a minimum order of £1000. We seriously considered it for a few moments, but decided that after whipping all those pots of cream that they would need a super sized freezer to keep it in. So instead we wrote begging letters to Waitrose and Ocado.
and… it worked!… It’s back! The first pots are being tucked into now by my very relieved daughter. I’m off to Waitrose to buy a half dozen pots tomorrow.
If the shelves are empty then I might regret having put this post out tonight!
In our recent post ‘Amazing results challenge guidelines in new study‘, we looked at research that came to exactly the opposite conclusion to that of The American Heart Association who currently recommend replacing saturated fat with MUFAs and omega-6 PUFAs. The researchers concluded:
recommendations of supplementation with these fatty acids in the general diet should be revised.
The public at large are confused by what they see as flip-flopping over dietary issues: butter is bad one week, but ‘back’ the next. Many people find it hard to believe that such an authoritative body as the American Heart Association could be wrong. How can a few small researcher groups and flag-waving bloggers (like us!) possibly be right? Surely august bodies like the AHA sort through the data and discard the poor quality studies? Surely they can be trusted to do due diligence on our behalf?
These are reasonable thoughts for people to have and they are not wrong to think like this, but such convictions rely on our public agencies not slipping into the kinds of confirmation bias that science is supposed to protect us from.
In a recent Op-Ed Gary Taubes (science journalist and author of the best selling book Good Calories Bad Calories) tackles this topic head on. Continue reading
🔍Click to enlarge. Please feel free to share.
I made this little infographic to illustrate the four main classes of fats. It gives typical sources of each and an example molecule from that group. Hope you find it useful. Please feel free to share!
This is a charming and quite unique shop that I stumbled upon recently in Hastings Old Town – and a great example of creative enterprise. The building is nearly 200 years old, having been built entirely of timber as a soda bottling warehouse. In 2008 it was purchased by the current owners who set about lovingly restoring it, removing decades of inappropriate modernising, stripping it back to the original timber structure whilst installing period pieces: reclaimed radiators, sanitary ware and Victorian pine match-boarding.
The shop sells all manner of household items: practical, basic, original and curious. This Aladins cave provided my family with a good half an hour of fascinated browsing, which could have gone on far longer if closing time had not descended upon us, but we came away with several strangely exciting purchases.
One of the stand out features of the shop is the panoply of different brushes hanging from the ceilings, jutting from cabinets and hung neatly on racks: feather dusters, bottle brushes, brooms, pot scrubbers, back scratchers, conical, spirallic and even a double headed brush specifically for computers: one side for dusting the screen and the other for the keyboard.
I was so impressed with the computer brush I bought one (above) and it does the job really well. the fluffier, longer side being kind to the screen and the brisker, shorter side, removing those pesky specs of ? from between the keys. Not cheap but I know it will be used on an almost daily basis, and I don’t think it will ‘go wrong’. Yes, it is all natural. The shop carries nothing made of plastic at all, and I think I could feel that as I stepped in!
Here are the scissors I bought. I have been needing some really good kitchen scissors, especially for dealing with poultry, and these have proved better than any scissors I have used before.
I hope you enjoy drinking in the photos below, and put this shop on your ‘places to visit’ list. The shop’s website details are at the end, and some of the other services they offer will surprise you…
(Click on any images below to view this gallery full screen)
A G Hendy and Co have their own great website for further exploration where I discovered they offer far more than was evident during my visit:
- Accommodation with box beds, tin baths, no wifi or TV.
- Courses in cooking and photography
- Restaurant, with home cooked local food (fresh Hastings fish)
- An online shop where you can purchase some of their wares
Last year a film was made about some of the troublesome issues around vaccination that most people are not aware of, and the film is now going to be shown in Bosham, near Chichester, at the end of this week.
No doubt you are all aware that a vigorous debate has been going on for decades about the pros and cons of vaccines in general and the way vaccines are promoted in particular. We all hear the mantras about them being ‘safe and effective’ through all the main media outlets, and yet concerns remain.
I have not seen this film yet but intend to be there and encourage others to come too. Let’s hear some of the issues discussed, exposed or disputed by those who were so exercised about the subject that they went to the trouble of making a film about it. It was due to be premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival in March 2016, but apparently pressure was successfully applied to have it withdrawn, nevertheless the cat is now out of the bag, and has made its way to West Sussex!
Being an advocate of free speech and open sharing of ideas, challenging or otherwise, and being a scientist who believes in following the evidence where it leads, without ideological interference, I would like to invite you to come with an open mind and find out what the ‘other side’ are saying. I doubt very much if their opinions would be permitted on the usual opinion providers, so it is good to support those brave enough to speak out against the ‘thought police’.
Date: Friday May 5th 2017
Venue: Hamblin Trust, Bosham House, Main Road, Bosham, Chichester, PO18 8PJ
Time: 7pm – 9pm
Cost: Donations appreciated for hire of film and venue. Suggested £5 per head.
Jordan Peterson (born 1962) is a Canadian clinical psychologist and tenured professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. His research interests include self-deception, mythology, religion, narrative, neuroscience, personality, deception, creativity, intelligence, and motivation. He is a highly cited and respected researcher in his field.
Recently, and much to his own surprise, Peterson has become an internet sensation, appearing all over the alternative media where he is challenging the contemporary narrative on ‘social justice’, free speech and atheism.
He does this with such clarity and insight that his YouTube videos have quickly racked up millions of hits and he has been sought-after for interviews with alternative news shows such as Stefan Molyneux’s FreeDomain Radio, The Rubin Report and The Saad Truth, all of which are intelligent, thought provoking sites, which I also recommend.
To this new-found audience Peterson has brought a much needed paradigm shift in many areas of previously intransigent and polarised debate. In other words, he’s just my kind of man! If you have not heard him speak then I would recommend starting here (over 2 hrs long) or for here for a juicy 20 minute excerpt. His students really rate him, and I am sure you will see why if you listen to the longer interviews above.
The main purpose of this post, however, is to share some specific points that Peterson has recently made on diet and health as they are surprisingly concordant with the approach we advocate on this blog. I’ve selected the relevant clips from his recent live stream Q&A session below.
Peterson recommending regular sleep to improve circadian rhythms, as well as a protein and fat rich breakfast (2 min clip)…
Peterson explaining how a paleo diet helped his daughter and him improve their health (3 min clip)…
Peterson returns to the subject of diet and how his views on it changed (3 min clip)…
There! Isn’t he a good ‘un?
Please do watch the other videos of this man, his new found Rock Star status is justified on the basis of intellectual depth, breadth and honesty. What’s not to like?
The recent video we posted of Dr SalimYusuf’s PURE study had a section on sodium intake, where he showed that the lowest risk of cardiovascular events, cardiovascular deaths and all-cause mortality was associated with an intake between 3000 and 6000 mg of sodium per day (equivalent to 7 to 15g salt per day). The current US average sodium intake is 3800 mg placing the general population nicely within this sweet spot, although towards the lower end.
Current US and UK dietary recommendations recommend an upper limit at 2300mg of sodium (6g of salt) whilst cardiovascular recommendations by bodies such as the American Heart Association aim to reduce sodium intake to 1500 mg per day (approx 3.75 g salt). If the PURE study is right (and it is not alone in questioning the current guidelines), then these aspirations would do more harm than good.
How did such discrepancy arise? The problem may be the use of surrogate markers. The thinking goes like this: Salt raises blood pressure. Raised blood pressure increases CVD risk, so salt increases CVD risk. This kind of thinking was evident in 2011 when the American Heart Association (AHA) called for salt targets to be reduced to 1500mg per day.At the time MedPage Today explained:
The evidence linking salt intake with blood pressure — and the major adverse outcomes of heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease — is “impressive,”…
That evidence includes more than 50 trials assessing the blood pressure effects of salt, as well as a meta-analysis showing that cutting salt intake by about 1,800 mg per day lowered blood pressure by 5 mm Hg systolic and 2.7 mm Hg diastolic.
This is a “critically important public health issue,” according to Appel and colleagues, and this AHA advisory must be considered “a call to action.”
On the basis of this ‘A leads to B leads to C, therefore A leads to C’ thinking initiatives were instigated all round the world to reduce public consumption of salt. A task force of concerned scientists even formed a lobby group to put pressure on food manufacturers, which successfully led to reductions in added salt in manufactured foods.
However, within a short time of the AHA call to action reports started coming in contradicting this advice.
Cut Daily Salt Intake to 1,500 Mg, AHA Says (Jan 2011)
Salt Study Discounts Link to Hypertension (Apr 2011)
Putting Down the Salt Shaker May Not Help Heart (Jul 2011)
“The cardiovascular benefits of salt restriction remain unproven on the basis of currently available evidence, say authors of a systematic review”
Scant Evidence That Salt Raises BP, Review Finds (Dec 2012)
“The evidence for health benefits associated with salt reduction is controversial and the ‘concealment of scientific uncertainty’ is a mistake”
Study: Salt May Not Be All Bad? (Jan 2015)
“Increased sodium intake was not associated with higher risk of mortality over the course of 10 years in Medicare patients.”
CardioBrief: Salt Restriction Harmful in Heart Failre? (Dec 2015)
A brilliant article full of despair and wit from which our quote of the year 2015 was gleaned.
CardioBrief: Salt Restriction only Beneficial in Hypertension? (May 2016)
“A large new analysis offers more evidence that broad salt restriction doesn’t benefit most people and may even harm some people.”
Over this period it is clear that scientists were becoming more and more irritated with the dogmatic approach of the AHA and government bodies, and by the last article were publicly calling the AHA anti-scientific!
Despite all of the research questioning the validity of further salt reduction US and UK policy remains stubbornly wedded to the ‘less is best trajectory’. In their 2016 survey the UK government reported proudly that average sodium consumption fell from 3500mg in 2005 to 3200 mg in 2014.
Their report claimed “Too much salt in the diet can raise blood pressure which increases the risk of heart disease and stroke. A reduction in average salt intake from 8g to 6g per day is estimated to prevent over 8000 premature deaths each year and save the NHS over £570million annually.”
Yet contrary evidence from studies including PURE would suggest that this is not simply futile but probably harmful. You would think that with the swathe of research challenging the low salt dogma that public policy would be questioning the wisdom of further reductions. Not a bit of it. Dr Alison Tedstone, chief nutritionist at Public Health England, makes no bones about it:
Our analysis makes clear that there is a steady downward trend in salt consumption. While people are having less salt than 10 years ago, we are still eating a third more than we should.
Many manufacturers and retailers have significantly reduced the salt levels in everyday foods. However, more needs to be done, especially by restaurants, cafes and takeaways.
The intransigence of health policy makers leads researchers to exasperation and despair. As one writer put it:
…the ‘salt hypothesis’ is rather like a monster from a 1950s B movie. Every time you attack it with evidence it simply shrugs it off and grows even stronger. – Malcolm Kendrick
In an interview with MedPage today researchers who found that patients with heart failure who ate more salt did better than those who ate less made the following statement which we have published before, but is such a gem it deserves another outing:
“We have had no basis for any of our recommendations regarding sodium restriction during the past 50 years, although these recommendations have changed a great deal (for no good reason). After this report, we still have no basis for any of our recommendations regarding sodium restriction. We were ignorant before; we are not any smarter now. Did we really need this report to tell us that we lack evidence for our recommendations regarding dietary sodium in patients with heart failure?”
– Milton Packer, Professor in the Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern
- Salt, Science And The American Heart Association’s Double Standard (Forbes Jan 2015)
- Salt of the Earth – Scant evidence that salt raises blood pressure (Rosemary Cottage Clinic, Dec 2012)